Defamation Law in Pakistan & Libel:

Nazia Law Associates the best law firm in Pakistan is expert in cases of defamation law in Pakistan. The complaint held an abuse of process of Court and cannot be allowed, proceedings quashed. The complaint filed after 2 years is an inordinate delay proceedings quashed. English rules and special damage: The English rules of special damage in oral defamation not to be adopted as per defamation law in Pakistan. The decision should be according to justice. Equity and good conscience: Exemplary damages through law firm in Pakistan: Notice of prosecution published in the newspaper, defamation presumed, damages may be exemplary.

General Damages:

The plaintiff consultant, independently depending his livelihood on reputation. The defamation is likely to affect his reputation and future earnings. Rs. 10,000 awarded as damages. Ingredients of libel: Libel, when constituted 1 Injury to reputation: The false statements implied by the defamatory, reputation, and business of the plaintiff hurt, the statement is defamatory. Insult: Mere insult does not amount to defamation. Insult attends against man's dignity but involves no false statement or suggestion but defamation is a false statement or suggestion of a fact to the prejudice of man's reputation.

Kinds of defamation:

According to our law firm in Pakistan, the defamation is of two kinds; (j) Libel; (ii) Salander

Newspaper and defamation law in Pakistan:

News items should not have been allowed to be published in the newspapers without due care, caution, and circumspection and without first ascertaining facts from the concerned quarter in Britain. The false reports published in the newspaper can cause irretrievable and irreparable damage to the reputation and social status of a citizen and can bring a bad name to the country. For this reason, it is necessary and desirable that journalists should be most watchful not to publish defamatory attacks upon individuals unless they first undertake responsible pains to ascertain that there are strong and cogent grounds for believing the truthfulness of the information which is sent to them. The Printer, Publisher, Editor, and Proprietor of a newspaper are as much responsible for a defamatory, damaging a disparaging news report published in their columns as if they were the original author and motivator. In defamation law in Pakistan, there is no special privilege for a journalist.

However, a fair comment on matters of public interest is permissible but it should not be used as a cloak for ventilating some personal vendetta against anyone. The Court dropped proceedings through law firm in Pakistan on the undertaking to contradict the news in the newspapers. Newspaper is not specifically privileged but has greater responsibility and duty to guard against untruth. Newspaper item tending to expose government servant, newspaper item, held, defamatory to the plaintiff’s. Libel action lies at places where the newspaper was published as well as where circulated. In defamation law in Pakistan the libelous material published in the newspaper, the responsibility of the editor, printer and publisher, held, joint and several words complained of defamatory, (ii) reflected to the plaintiff, (iii) and publication to the third party, defendant proving privilege, the onus lies on the plaintiff.  In Our Law Firm in Lahore, we have many expert lawyers in Lahore who are working on the Defamation Law in Pakistan in all over the Pakistan.

Damages for Defamation Law in Pakistan:

Nazia Law Associates is the best law firm in Pakistan for cases of damages due to defamation law in Pakistan. Grant of damages against the publication of the defamatory and libelous statement, no rule of law laid down for assessment of general damages in defamation cases, compensation awarded not appeared to punitive or exemplary. News item published by defendants defamatory in nature, no proof of special damage, but entitled to general damages due to defamation law in Pakistan. Defamatory statement published in the newspaper, action for damages. The plaintiff under no obligation to prove imputation to be false. The defendant pleading justification, the onus lies on the defendant. Published in the newspaper is greater wrong, damages increased from Rs- 5,000.00 to 14.000.00. Defamation as soon as published makes out complete offense irrespective of any consequences.

Dismissed the Suit for Damages against T. V. Corporation:

Publication of imputations intended to safeguard the interest of the maker thereof and also for the public good, without any malicious motive, does not amount to defamation. Petitioner in jail at the time of publication of alleged defamatory article, contention that it was published by the supervision of his wife is devoid of force. In suit for defamation on the alleged defamation notice sent by T. V. Corporation to license-holder for the deposit of license fee with the threat of criminal prosecution, such suit filed by the license holder for damages with the plea that notices of T. V. Corporation had not only lowered the plaintiff in the eyes of the public did not arise as notices read by him through the post as such lower Courts flatly dismissed the suit for damages against T. V. Corporation. The public notice by the employer that an employee is no longer in employee’s service is privileged and protected. It cannot be made the basis for action for defamation law in Pakistan. The employer doesn't need to prove that in cases of other employees he had published similar notices. English version of public notice was not defamatory.

Privileges:

Defamation is a qualified privilege; the action lies if malice is proved. Person performing official duty and acting out of civil and moral sense, no action in tort for defamation is maintainable as per defamation law in Pakistan. Privileges of advocate and law firm in Pakistan: Advocate privilege of the matter of civil liability for defamation, the privilege does not extend to malicious, statement and matters not germane to litigation, the position of litigants. Complaint containing defamatory matter against an advocate not disowned by its author and the allegation made to Bar Council make it known to public amounts to the implication of libelous matter, Advocate "officer of Court" and law firm in Pakistan occupying a high position in society, that amount of damages decreed not excessive. No action for libel or slander lies whether against judges. counsels, witnesses, or parties for words written or spoken or statements made in the course of any proceedings before any Court recognized by law through the words written or spoken maliciously without any justification or excuse and from personal ill-will and anger against the person defamed. In Our Law Firm in Lahore, we have many expert lawyers in Lahore who are working on the Property cases in all over the Pakistan.

Representation through Property Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan:

For representation through property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan Advocate Nazia is the best Advocate. Declaratory suit on basis of agreement is not maintainable, specific performance may be claimed as consequential relief, Agreement creating interest in immovable property but not stamped, declaratory suit not maintainable. Agreement to sell, declaratory suit on it is not maintainable. Declaratory suit filed by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan on unregistered sale deed is not maintainable. Breach of contract, suit for damages without asking for specific performance of contract is properly framed. Declaration that the plaintiff is not guilty of breach of contract is not a declaration of legal nature, suit not maintainable. Contract for refreshment room, declaration that the contract still subsists cannot be granted.

Declaration of Tenants:

Suit for declaration filed by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan as to tenant not maintainable. Decree against dead person (1) Decree against dead person having no legal sanctity, same to be set aside and further proceedings to be commenced in presence of his legal representatives.

Declaratory Decree not binding on Stranger:

Declaratory decree is binding on parties and not on strangers.

Declaration of gift:

Factum of gift and transfer of possession by deceased in favour of plaintiff not objected to by defendants, plaintiff or property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan would thus, be deemed to have exclusive right to property in question while defendants would have no right. Title and interest therein. Plaintiff having found entitled to declaration and injunction with regard to property in question suit was decreed. Gift was made by father of petitioner's in favour of respondents, undisputedly proved to have been validly made one of the petitioners herself admitted execution of that gift in favour of respondents by her father and possession of gifted property also delivered to respondents no merits, dismissed.

Declaration under agreement to sell:

Plaintiff through property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan having entered into unregistered agreement of sate which had been subsequently abrogated by vendors could be granted declaration that plaintiff was in possession of property under enforceable contract of sale in his favour and that vendors and person claiming under them would refrain from interfering with such possession. Declaration when property under attachment under Section 145, P. C.: The respondents were not in possession after the attachment and were not in a position to deliver possession to the appellants. The Magistrate was in possession, for whomsoever and he was not a party to the suit. Property under attachment under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code is in custodial legis. It was not necessary for to have asked for possession.

The question is not whether a declaratory decree would be binding on the Magistrate or not. The fact that it may not be binding would not affect the competence of the suit. The suit filed by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan for a declaration without a claim for the relief for possession would still be competent. It is not necessary to ask for the relief of delivery of possession where the defendant is not in possession and is not able to deliver possession, as in the case when the property is under attachment under Section 145 of the Code. In Our Law Firm in Lahore, we have many expert lawyers in Lahore who are working on the Property cases in all over the Pakistan.

Injunctions by Property Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan:

For injunctions if you need property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan, Advocate Nazia is the best advocate. Suit for declaration and perpetual injunction, Court while dismissing suit found that evidence led by plaintiff was insufficient, witnesses could not identify property in question and evidence produced did not inspire confidence. Plaintiffs through property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan claim for ownership had not been proved through evidence. Defendant’s possession was undisputed, entries in revenue record was in favour of defendants, no misreading of evidence, leave refused. High Court after taking into consideration all points concluded that the respondents who had been shown as tenants in revenue record of suit land since 1970, were in occupation since then and that the authorities had received installments of purchase money from respondents and had allowed them transfer of suit property, that since even according to petitioner's own showings he was not in possession of suit land for more than 15 years, obviously without claiming consequential relief.

Suit for Declaration through Property Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan:

Suit for declaration through property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan in the present form was not maintainable. Plaintiff's relationship with deceased plaintiff's evidence that deceased was his relative and that he was his legal heir was not rebutted by cogent evidence, finding that the plaintiff was the only legal heir of deceased upheld. When there was no declaratory decree the question of flowing consequences there from would not arise consequential relief could not be granted after dismissing main relief of declaration. Plaintiff who was not highest bidder in auction of plot in dispute could not claim as a matter of right the acceptance of his bid and could not coerce authorities to transfer plot in his favour or claim right to have opportunity of being heard before restoration of sale in favour of defendant. Sale through auction in favour of successful bidder could not be invalidated simply because purchaser has abandoned his claim and rights in auctioned plot.

Declaration of easement of necessity by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan: Declaration, to easement of necessity. No prescriptive right proved. Suit rightly dismissed.'  Declaration of examination result: Suit for declaration that the petitioner has passed the matriculation examination and word ' 'expelled" had been wrongly placed before his name in the result sheet is maintainable. Declaration of Pension: Suit for declaration filed by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan that the person is entitled to pension is competent. Declaration of title on basis of agreement to sell: Suit for declaration of title to property on the basis of agreement to sell is not maintainable.

Declaration on Basis of Possession:

Entries in revenue record coupled without evidence proved possession of plaintiff over suit land. Declaration to supply electricity: Suit for declaration filed by property lawyers in Lahore Pakistan from law firms in Lahore Pakistan that disconnection of electric supply and subsequent issue of detection bi}is and injunction for restoration connection, the High Court granted injunction for restoration of connection. Declaration on contracts (I) Dismissal from contractual service, declaratory suit not Declaration instead of specific performance if legally maintainable would be competent. Declaratory suit on the basis of agreement is not maintainable.  Agreement to sell executed earlier than the transaction of oral gift in favour of plaintiff, suit on basis of alleged oral gift collusive- I an agreement does not create right of ownership, declaratory suit not maintainable remedy lies for suit of specific performance of contract. In Our Law Firm in Lahore, we have many expert lawyers in Lahore who are working on the Property cases in all over the Pakistan.